Jovcic v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia and Coopers Brewery Ltd  SAET 48
HomeJovcic v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia and Coopers Brewery Ltd  SAET 48
What actions are considered to be unreasonable administrative actions by an Employer, and when are they considered to be undertaken in a unreasonable manner?
This case considered this issue against a background where a worker had made a psychological injury claim arising from his employer’s actions in an investigation of allegations put to the worker. Specifically, the worker stated that the employer had been unreasonable in its investigation by issuing him with a first and final written warning; allowing the worker to work on night shift for an extended time, which had left him chronically tired; and by not providing the worker with a proper opportunity to consider the employer’s evidence in the investigation.
While the SAET acknowledged that the worker had been untruthful in giving evidence, it noted that this was not relevant to the reasonableness of the action taking against the worker by the employer. The SAET found that the worker ‘was not given sufficient details of materials relevant to the investigation and was not able to properly consider his response’. Further, it also found that the worker had not been prevented from working nightshift for an extended period of time, which was against company policy and therefore also an unreasonable action.
Consequently, the SAET determined that the worker’s claim should be accepted.
We're here to help
Let us help you decide what's best for your business.